Tax & ATO News Australia
Searching for tag: taskforce
ATO’s Changes Out Of The Ashes Of The Phoenix
By now, most of us have heard the term Phoenix Company, described by Nick Sherry1, as being “Similar to the mythical creature from which it takes its name, phoenix activity in its basic form involves the winding up of a company and the subsequent continuation of that business in a new ‘risen’ company.”
The great difficulty I have with terms like “phoenix” is that while they fit neatly into politicians’ soundbites and press releases, their real life application is much harder for the ATO to adequately define. This in turn means that taxpayers are left in the terrifying position of not knowing whom the laws are targeting.
In a 2012 report by PwC in conjunction with the Fair Work Ombudsman (Phoenix Activity Report), Phoenix activity was finally defined as; “the deliberate and systematic liquidation of a corporate trading entity which occurs with the fraudulent or illegal intention to:
• avoid tax and other liabilities, such as employee entitlements
• continue the operation and profit taking of the business through another trading entity.”
There is no doubt, that the worst of these activities often leave a lasting legacy with unpaid wages, super, outstanding invoices to suppliers and other debts. The cost of which has been estimated at almost $2 billion by the ATO.
The key words in the PwC definition are “deliberate”, “systematic” and “fraudulent”. Where directors have engaged in such behaviour to avoid paying employee entitlements, then the full force of the law should be used. But what of the company that through no fault of the directors is left in a position where debts have mounted and the company cannot continue to operate? Should the same strict rules apply?
The great difficulty in administering tax law through emotive sound bites, is that it has the potential to lead ATO officers to think that acting tough should replace acting fairly. It is all too easy for an ATO officer to conclude that because a company has been liquidated, that the elements of fraud and deliberation must automatically be present. The cost and stress to taxpayers who are innocent of such charges is immeasurable.
The Federal Government has recently announced that it will establish two taskforces run jointly by the ATO and other governmental organisations (see below for full list of involvement), one of which will confront phoenix activity. Whilst this strategy by the ATO shows very clearly that it is willing to be very tough on the worst and most blatant offenders, I can’t help but also be concerned at the effect this may have on the vast majority of taxpayers who try to do the right thing. Don’t get me wrong, I encourage a tough approach by the ATO for those that deliberately flout the law, if at the same time, there is a more reasonable approach for the taxpayers who try to do the right thing, and inadvertently get something wrong. Worse yet is the potential for the nightmare scenario for taxpayers of being accused by the ATO of something that is just completely false.
I have seen too much time, energy and money wasted in the past, when the ATO directs its resources at the wrong people (as confirmed in the Inspector General of Taxation’s very recent report. It is not an exaggeration to say that the ATO has wrongfully destroyed people’s lives and businesses with misdirected efforts or at worst ill-intentioned or uninformed objectives.
So yes, by all means, I heartedly applaud the ATO for going after the crooks, but let the rest of the SME community get on with business without unfair and wrongful interference. I would like very much to see this become law, in a way that is balanced and fair.
Fortunately, the ATO is making changes and we, here at SMH, have had great results with recent settlements for taxpayers. The concern, again identified by the IGT, is that these changes depend on the commissioner of the day being a benevolent dictator.
1. former Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law
*The Trusts Taskforce is made up of the ATO, Australian Federal Police (AFP), Australian Crime Commission (ACC), Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Australian Government Solicitor (AGS), Attorney-General's Department (AGD), AUSTRAC, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Australian Business Register (ABR) and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
The Phoenix Taskforce is made up of the ATO, ASIC, AFP, ACC, ABR, the Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Building and Construction, the Department of Environment, the Department of Employment, the Department of Immigration and Border Protection and the NSW and Victorian Offices of State Revenue.
Posted in: Tax & ATO News Australia at 16 March 15
New ATO taskforce
In the wake of Crown Insurance Services recent win in the High Court, the ATO has announced a new taskforce to examine the activities of companies which have based themselves offshore.
Posted in: Tax & ATO News Australia at 17 July 13
Share

Tax & ATO News Australia
Author: David Hughes
Last 12 months
- January 2021 (0)
- December 2020 (0)
- November 2020 (0)
- October 2020 (0)
- September 2020 (0)
- August 2020 (0)
- July 2020 (0)
- June 2020 (0)
- May 2020 (0)
- April 2020 (0)
- March 2020 (0)
- February 2020 (0)
- Show All
Tags
- Australian National Audit Office (1)
- SNF (1)
- NSW duty (1)
- High Court of Australia (2)
- excess contributions tax (1)
- Crown Insurance Services (2)
- High Court (3)
- Administrative Appeals Tribunal (8)
- Section 264 (1)
- stamp duty (1)
- tax ombudsman (1)
- Division 815 (1)
- Income Tax Regulations (2)
- Goods and Services Tax (2)
- SPAA (1)
- Federal Court (4)
- Tax (27)
- NAB (1)
- Income Tax Assessment 1936 (2)
- land tax (1)
- Federal Assistant Treasurer (2)
- wire tapping (2)
- Joe Hockey (2)
- taxable supply (1)
- SMSF (4)
- bankruptcy notices (1)
- Deportation (2)
- retirement savings (2)
- Taxation Administration Act 1953 (3)
- payroll tax (1)
- Celebrity Tax Evaders (1)
- investigative powers (3)
- Shadow Treasurer (1)
- Assistant Treasurer (2)
- self-managed funds (4)
- bankruptcy regulations (1)
- Transfer duty (1)
- Bill Shorten (3)
- Income tax (6)
- Crown Insurance Limited (1)
- AAT (20)
- Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence (1)
- taxpayers (17)
- cash economy (1)
- s264 notices (2)
- Crown Insurance (1)
- Business assets (1)
- Superannuation Minister (2)
- tax returns (4)
- debt disputes (4)
- taxpayer (9)
- European Union Data Retention Directive (1)
- Parliamentary Committee (1)
- taxman (6)
- Chris Jordan (7)
- taskforce (2)
- Queensland State Government (1)
- Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (4)
- notice of assessment (5)
- debt collection (3)
- Departure Prohibition Order (1)
- superannuation contributions (2)
- Australian resident (2)
- Gary Kurzer (2)
- Tax Commissioner (25)
- tax audit (5)
- audits (3)
- ITAA (3)
- assessment notice (3)
- exchange rate (1)
- carbon tax (1)
- super contributions (3)
- non-resident (2)
- Ron Pattenden (2)
- tax appeals (10)
- discretionary trust partnerships (1)
- heavy handling (2)
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1)
- tax fraud (4)
- foreign currency (1)
- Federal Government (2)
- super contributions caps (2)
- resides test (1)
- David Hughes (1)
- Administrative Appears Tribunal (5)
- CGT (3)
- Tax Office (21)
- OECD (1)
- tax evasion (10)
- Part IVA (1)
- concessional contributions (3)
- domicile test (1)
- ATO (58)
- Crown Insurance Services Limited (1)
- small business (9)
- income splitting schemes (1)
- inspector general of taxation (11)
- Double tax agreements (1)
- Commissioner of Taxation (17)
- tax benefit (1)
- non-concessional contributions (2)
- 183 day test (1)
- GST (5)
- Full Federal Court (3)
- decision impact statement (1)
- Office of State Revenue (1)
- Show All